Cookiebot Alternatives: 8 Options Tested and Compared (2026)

• Enzuzo: best overall for multi-domain businesses, agencies, and Shopify merchants that want consent plus DSARs at a flat rate
• CookieYes: best for a single WordPress site or blog that needs a fast, cheap banner
• Complianz: best for WordPress teams that want consent and legal documents inside the CMS
• Termly: best for a small site that needs cookie consent and a stack of legal policies on a budget
• Osano: best for teams growing a broader privacy program past a banner
• iubenda: best for EU-focused policy management across many languages
• Axeptio: best for EU sites that care most about banner design and UX
• OneTrust: best for large enterprises running a full governance program

Cookiebot is still a good choice for one site with a steady page count. Its WordPress plugin holds a 4.4 rating from 440 reviews, it holds Gold in Google's CMP Partner Program, and it switches Consent Mode v2 on out of the box.

Teams leave Cookiebot for a few main reasons:

• Cookiebot bills every domain at a tier set by its page count, and every subdomain counts as a domain. Since August 18, 2025, the cheaper €15 tier has been closed to accounts with fewer than four domains, which leaves a two- or three-site account paying €30 for each mid-sized domain. Enzuzo's Cookiebot pricing guide breaks down the math.
• Banner geo-fencing isn't intuitive or easy to set up inside the UI. The product feels outdated for some users
• Support can be hard to reach. Email and web tickets only mean there's no option to talk to a human live over a video call for onboarding help.
• Data subject access requests (DSARs) is not a supported workflow, on any plan. 
  
  

Ranking and comparing Cookiebot alternatives

Enzuzo compared each platform on eight factors that decide a switch away from Cookiebot: pricing model, multi-domain support, DSAR handling, API access, policy generation, Shopify support, Google CMP Partner tier, and reviews.

The Google CMP tier is the level Google assigns in its CMP Partner Program, and a DSAR is a person's request to see or delete their data. A consent management platform supports compliance work; it doesn't make a site compliant on its own.

Seven of the eight alternatives have a free plan of some kind, and the limits decide how far each one stretches.

1. Enzuzo (best for growing businesses & multi-domain support)

Best for: mid-market teams, agencies, and ecommerce brands that run several sites.

Enzuzo is the strongest Cookiebot alternative for a business with more than one domain that wants consent and DSARs on one plan. Enzuzo's consent management platform pairs the cookie banner with consent logs, policy generators, compliance reporting, and a DSAR workflow, which handles three requests a month on the free plan and an unlimited number on Pro.

Enzuzo prices by domain allowance and monthly visitors instead of page count. The Growth plan covers four domains and the Pro plan covers ten at one flat rate, with unlimited scanned pages, so adding a site within the allowance doesn't add a separate bill.

Enzuzo and Cookiebot match on certifications: both hold Gold in Google's CMP Partner Program. Enzuzo adds Microsoft UET Consent Mode on every plan and IAB TCF 2.3 support, too.

Regional control starts on Growth, which adds geo-specific consent rules and basic geo-specific blocking, and Pro adds the full version, as highlighted on the pricing page. In Enzuzo's dashboard, each region gets its own blocking mode and Google Consent Mode setting (Basic, Advanced, or off), and the regional rules never live in Google Tag Manager.

For Shopify merchants, Enzuzo's app has been listed since 2020, five years before Cookiebot's own app launched in November 2025.

Where Enzuzo falls short: Enzuzo caps monthly visitors on its self-serve plans: 5,000 on Starter, 10,000 on Growth, and 30,000 on Pro. A high-traffic site needs a custom quote, for added traffic or the Enterprise plan. Enzuzo also has no data mapping or vendor-risk module, so a large privacy program will get more from OneTrust.

Key features:

• Google Consent Mode v2 and Microsoft UET Consent Mode on every plan, as a Gold-tier Google CMP partner
• Multi-domain management: 4 domains on Growth, 10 on Pro, from one dashboard
• DSAR workflow on every plan, with a custom request form from Growth up
• Consent logs, privacy policy and terms generators, and compliance reporting
• Geo-specific consent from Growth, with per-region blocking modes and Google Consent Mode settings set in the dashboard
• Shopify app, a basic API on every plan, and a shared Slack channel on Enterprise

Pricing. A free plan covers one domain and 5,000 monthly visitors. Paid plans start at $9 a month ($7 billed yearly) for Starter. Growth is $29 a month ($22 yearly) for 4 domains and 10,000 visitors, and Pro is $79 a month ($59 yearly) for 10 domains and 30,000 visitors.

Choose Enzuzo when a business runs two to ten domains under 30,000 monthly visitors and wants DSARs on the same plan as consent.

Book a call with a consent management expert to compare your options and see how Enzuzo stacks up.

2. CookieYes: best for a single WordPress site

Best for: a single WordPress site or blog that would rather pay by traffic than by page count.

CookieYes is the closest like-for-like swap for a Cookiebot user with one site and a lighter budget. CookieYes handles cookie scanning, a customizable banner, consent logs, and Google Consent Mode v2, and its WordPress plugin has more than 1 million active installs on WordPress.org.

CookieYes prices by pageviews, with no page-count tiers, though each plan caps how many pages a scan covers: 600 on Basic, 4,000 on Pro, and 8,000 on Ultimate. Its free plan covers a small site outright, and every plan, Free included, keeps a consent log.

Google also lists CookieYes at Gold, and CookieYes publishes its own Shopify app.  Read the comparison of the two directly in Cookiebot vs CookieYes.

Where CookieYes falls short: CookieYes bills each extra domain as its own subscription, and no plan includes a DSAR tool or a server-side API. Reviewers on WordPress.org report plugin conflicts: a 2024 review said the banner broke payment fields in Gravity Forms for every visitor except logged-in admins, and an older 2023 review cites a WooCommerce add-to-cart conflict.

Key features:

• Cookie scanning and a consent banner with Google Consent Mode v2
• Consent logs on every plan; geo-targeting, GPC, and IAB TCF 2.3 on Pro and Ultimate
• Privacy and cookie policy generators on every plan
• WordPress plugin and a Shopify app

Pricing. A free plan covers 5,000 pageviews a month on one domain. Paid plans are per domain: Basic $10 a month (100,000 pageviews), Pro $25 a month (300,000 pageviews), and Ultimate $55 a month (unlimited pageviews, branding removal). Annual billing gives two months free.

Choose CookieYes when one site stays under 100,000 pageviews a month, the Basic plan's limit, and doesn't need DSARs or an API.

3. Complianz: best for WordPress teams

Best for: WordPress-only teams, especially agencies managing a handful of client sites.

Complianz answers a specific Cookiebot gap: it keeps consent and legal documents inside WordPress instead of a hosted dashboard. Complianz is a WordPress plugin that generates region-specific consent banners and legal documents, scans cookies, and on its paid tiers supports Google Consent Mode v2 and IAB TCF.

Complianz bills yearly by the number of sites, where Cookiebot bills monthly per domain by page count, so a multi-site owner pays one flat annual price. The Agency plan adds a multisite plugin with cross-domain consent, and Complianz also publishes a Shopify app. The full feature split is in Enzuzo's Cookiebot vs Complianz comparison.

Where Complianz falls short: Complianz's free plugin leaves out Google Consent Mode v2, IAB TCF, and consent records, and a WordPress.org reviewer complained that Consent Mode needs the paid upgrade. Setup is the other recurring complaint: a September 2026 review describes a setup wizard that took three hours for a simple notice. Complianz holds Silver in Google's CMP Partner Program, a tier below Gold.

Key features:

• WordPress-native consent banner and cookie scanning
• Region-specific consent and legal document generation
• Google Consent Mode v2 and IAB TCF on paid tiers
• A data request form and consent records on paid tiers
• A multisite plugin for WordPress networks on the Agency plan

Pricing. A free plugin is available. Paid tiers are yearly and priced by site count, at list price: Personal $59 a year (1 site), Professional $179 a year (5 sites), and Agency $399 a year (25 sites). Every tier includes unlimited consent records and pageviews.

Choose Complianz when every site runs WordPress and $179 a year for five sites beats Cookiebot's €30 ($34) a month for each mid-sized domain.

4. Termly: best budget option 

Best for: a small site that needs the legal documents as much as the banner.

Termly fits the Cookiebot user who needs more than a banner but wants to stay cheap. Alongside cookie consent, Termly generates legal policies, monitors regulation changes, and offers regional consent rules on its Pro+ plan.

Termly bundles consent with all ten of its policy generators: its Pro+ plan, at $15 a month billed yearly, covers privacy and cookie policies, terms and conditions, a disclaimer, and an EULA. Google ranks Termly Gold in its CMP Partner Program, and even Termly's free plan includes an embeddable DSAR form.

Where Termly falls short: Termly's consent logs, IAB TCF 2.3, regional consent rules, and Advanced Consent Mode all require Pro+, and pricing stacks per website. Its DSAR feature is an intake form with email alerts, it publishes no public API, and it has no Shopify app. A 2024 WordPress.org review measured a performance score of about 40 with the plugin on and about 72 with it off.

Key features:

• Cookie consent banner with a script auto-blocker
• Ten legal policy generators
• Regulation monitoring from Starter; auto-updated policies on Pro+
• IAB TCF 2.3, regional consent rules, and consent logs on Pro+

Pricing. A free plan covers one policy and 10,000 banner views a month. Paid plans are per website: Starter $10 a month billed yearly ($14 monthly) and Pro+ $15 a month billed yearly ($20 monthly), with an Agency plan quoted from 10 websites. Annual billing saves about 25%.

Choose Termly when $15 a month for consent plus ten policy generators beats buying them separately on a single website.

5. Osano: best for a broader privacy program

Best for: teams whose privacy program now reaches into data mapping, vendor risk, and assessments.

Osano covers more than a basic banner and less than a full enterprise suite. Osano handles cookie consent and adds subject rights, data mapping, vendor risk, and assessments as a program grows, with a documented REST API and webhooks for developers.

Osano's self-serve Plus plan bundles more than a banner: two users, three domains, privacy and legal templates, and an EU and UK representative service. That service is the local contact the GDPR requires of companies based outside those regions. Osano also publishes a Shopify app, launched in August 2024, and Enzuzo's Osano vs Cookiebot page compares the two directly.

Where Osano falls short: Osano's pricing jumps from the $199 Plus plan to a custom quote for a fourth domain, more than 30,000 visitors, or any DSAR handling. On G2, limited customization ties with price as the most-cited con, followed by an unclear interface. Google lists Osano at Silver in its CMP Partner Program, one tier below Cookiebot and Enzuzo.

Key features:

• Cookie consent with automatic scanning and consent records
• Google Consent Mode support
• Subject rights, data mapping, and vendor risk management on higher tiers
• Privacy and legal templates, a REST API, and webhooks

Pricing. A free plan covers one domain and 5,000 monthly visitors. The self-serve Plus plan is $199 a month for 3 domains and 30,000 visitors. The Basic Privacy tier and its added modules move to a custom quote, and Osano's main plans page shows no prices.

Choose Osano when three domains and 30,000 visitors on the $199 Plus plan works for your team.

6. iubenda: best for EU-focused policy management

Best for: agencies that produce legal documents for clients in several EU languages.

iubenda reaches past the banner into legal documents, which is its pull for EU-focused teams. iubenda combines cookie consent with privacy and cookie policies, site scanning, and Google Consent Mode, which works even on its free plan.

iubenda's policy generator is available in 27 languages, according to its generator page. Every paid plan includes IAB TCF and a consent log, and the REST API starts on the Advanced plan. For Shopify, iubenda has no app under its own name and points merchants to an insert-code app. Enzuzo also compares Cookiebot vs iubenda on their own page.

Where iubenda falls short: iubenda prices each site separately and caps pageviews by plan. Its data subject rights tool and mobile SDK come only with the Ultimate plan, at $119.99 a month per site. Reviewers on G2 cite complexity and difficult navigation, and one WordPress.org reviewer called the plugin's setup a UX disaster.

Key features:

• Cookie consent with Google Consent Mode on every plan and IAB TCF on paid plans
• Privacy and cookie policy generation in 27 languages
• Site scanning with automatic regulatory updates
• REST API from Advanced; DSAR tool and mobile SDK on Ultimate

Pricing. A free tier covers sites with fewer than 5,000 pageviews a month and keeps iubenda's branding. Paid plans are per site. Essentials costs $6.99 a month ($5.99 yearly, 25,000 pageviews), Advanced $27.99 a month ($24.99 yearly, 50,000 pageviews), and Ultimate $119.99 a month ($99.99 yearly, 150,000 pageviews).

Choose iubenda when policies in 27 languages matter as much as the banner, and each site's pageviews fit its tier.

7. Axeptio: best for UX-forward EU consent

Best for: design-led EU brands with one domain.

Axeptio competes on banner design: customizable, conversational consent widgets, with Google Consent Mode v2 on every plan and a cookie scanner from its Small plan up.

The rest of Axeptio's stack is standard: it holds Gold in Google's partner program, and its own Shopify app adds a free plan for stores with up to 200 visitors a month.

Where Axeptio falls short: Axeptio's website lists no free plan, every self-serve plan covers a single domain, and the platform has no DSAR tool or policy generator. API access is Enterprise only. On G2, the top con is difficulty reaching support, and one reviewer complains about being charged for bot sessions.

Key features:

• Customizable, UX-forward consent widgets
• Google Consent Mode v2 on every plan; IAB TCF from Small
• Cookie scanner from Small and analytics connectors from Medium
• API access and unlimited domains on Enterprise

Pricing. Axeptio's website plans are priced per domain and scale by pageviews. The page shows local currency; these euro prices come from an August 2026 copy. Extra Small costs €90 a year (€7 a month, yearly billing only; 2,500 pageviews). Billed monthly, Small is €29 (5,000 pageviews), Medium €69 (100,000), and Large €129 (500,000).

Axeptio quotes Enterprise for unlimited domains, and annual billing saves about 10%.

Choose Axeptio when the banner's look matters more than DSARs or policy generation, on a single domain.

8. OneTrust: best for large enterprise governance

Best for: enterprises with a dedicated privacy team.

OneTrust aims at organizations whose needs run far beyond a cookie banner. OneTrust bundles consent with data mapping, subject rights, vendor risk, assessments, and AI governance at scale.

OneTrust's scope is why enterprises choose it, and why a team that only needs a banner would pay for modules it never opens. OneTrust publishes no prices, but the standard is a $ 10,000-a-year minimum.  

Enzuzo's OneTrust vs Cookiebot comparison goes deeper on the two.

Where OneTrust falls short: OneTrust's consent product rates 3.5 out of 5 on G2 from 16 reviews, with complex setup as the top con. Vendr puts implementation and onboarding at 20 to 40% of the annual subscription, and OneTrust has no self-serve plan and no Shopify app.

Key features:

• Consent and preference management at enterprise scale
• Data mapping, subject rights, and vendor risk management
• Assessments and AI governance modules
• Enterprise integrations, developer APIs, and dedicated support

Pricing. OneTrust's pricing page lists packages with no dollar figures. Vendr reports a $12,000 median contract and observed deals from $1,620 to $48,215 a year.

Choose OneTrust when consent is one line in a five-figure governance contract and the team can absorb a 20 to 40% implementation cost.

How Cookiebot pricing works in 2026

Cookiebot prices by page count, which none of the eight alternatives (Enzuzo, CookieYes, Complianz, Termly, Osano, iubenda, Axeptio, or OneTrust) does. Its scanner counts each domain's pages and bills that domain at one of six monthly tiers, from free under 50 pages to €90 ($96) at 7,000 or more, according to its pricing page.

The other eight meter something else: CookieYes, iubenda, and Axeptio price by pageviews, Complianz by site count, Termly per website, Enzuzo and Osano by a domain allowance plus monthly visitors, and OneTrust by negotiated contract. That's why the same portfolio bills so differently across the eight.

Which Cookiebot alternative should you choose?

Two questions are key for the evaluation: how many domains and subdomains the business runs, and whether its privacy work stops at the banner or includes DSARs, policies, and governance.

• Two to ten domains, with consent and DSARs on one plan: Enzuzo
• One WordPress site that wants the cheapest banner: CookieYes
• Several WordPress sites managed inside the CMS: Complianz
• One small site that also needs a full set of legal policies: Termly
• A program adding data mapping and vendor risk: Osano
• Legal documents in many EU languages: iubenda
• One EU domain where banner design comes first: Axeptio
• An enterprise governance program: OneTrust
  
  

Staying on Cookiebot still makes sense for:

• a single site with heavy traffic and a few hundred pages, since Cookiebot's price ignores traffic
• an account already at four or more mid-sized domains, where each one bills at €15
• a WordPress site that runs well on Cookiebot's plugin, which has more than 100,000 active installs
  
  

Looking for a Cookiebot partner or reseller program?

Cookiebot and Enzuzo both run partner programs: Cookiebot's front-loads its commission, while Enzuzo's pays a flat share for the life of each account.

Cookiebot runs two partner tracks: an affiliate program that pays referrers, and a reseller program for agencies that sell Cookiebot to clients. A reseller account has to be a Premium Cookiebot account with payment details on file, even for agencies that only use the retail model.

Cookiebot's longer referral window and higher early reseller rate suit agencies with short client relationships. Its affiliate payout stops after 12 months, though, and its reseller rate halves after three years.

Enzuzo's partner program pays a lower first-year rate than Cookiebot's retail resale track (30% against 40%) but keeps paying that 30% for the life of the account. Enzuzo's multi-domain plans also let an agency manage several client sites from one dashboard instead of stacking per-domain, per-page bills.

Frequently asked questions

What is the best free Cookiebot alternative?

Enzuzo has the most complete free plan for a business that also gets data requests, since it adds a DSAR workflow to the banner and consent log for one domain under 5,000 monthly visitors. CookieYes, Osano, Termly, and iubenda also offer free plans capped by traffic, and Complianz has a free WordPress plugin without Google Consent Mode v2. Axeptio's free plan exists only on Shopify, and OneTrust has none.

Who are Cookiebot's main competitors?

Cookiebot's main competitors are self-serve consent tools such as CookieYes, Complianz, Termly, iubenda, and Axeptio, mid-market platforms such as Enzuzo and Osano, and enterprise suites such as OneTrust. Cookiebot's own parent, Usercentrics, also sells a separate session-priced consent product, which Enzuzo's review weighs in Cookiebot vs Usercentrics. Most of these publish self-serve prices, while OneTrust sells only by quote.

Which Cookiebot alternatives scan for cookies automatically?

Termly, iubenda, CookieYes, and Axeptio all run scheduled cookie scans, with the frequency set by plan. Termly scans quarterly on Free, monthly on Starter, and weekly on Pro+. iubenda scans monthly, or hourly on Ultimate. CookieYes schedules monthly scans on Pro and weekly scans on Ultimate, and Axeptio allows 30 scheduled scans a month from Medium. Enzuzo's plans put no cap on scanned pages.

Is there an open-source Cookiebot alternative?

No open-source tool fully replaces a managed CMP like Cookiebot. Open-source consent libraries such as Klaro and Orejime render the banner, but they leave cookie scanning, consent storage, and regulatory updates to the site owner. Teams that want those managed use a hosted tool such as Enzuzo, CookieYes, or Complianz.

What is the best Cookiebot alternative for WordPress?

Complianz is the strongest WordPress-native choice, because it runs as a plugin and generates region-specific banners and legal documents inside the CMS. CookieYes is the lighter option for a single WordPress site, with more than 1 million active installs. Enzuzo suits WordPress teams that also run other platforms or need DSARs and multi-domain pricing.

What is the best Cookiebot alternative for Shopify?

Enzuzo is the best Shopify fit for merchants that want consent and DSARs together, through a Shopify app listed since 2020. CookieYes, Complianz, Osano, and Axeptio also publish Shopify apps, while Termly and OneTrust don't have one. Cookiebot launched its own Shopify app in November 2025, priced per store from free to $30 a month.

Which is better, Cookiebot or CookieYes?

CookieYes is better for a single WordPress site that wants traffic-based pricing, and Cookiebot is better for a busy site with few pages. CookieYes prices by pageviews and caps pages per scan, while Cookiebot prices by page count with no traffic limit. Both bill each extra domain separately and neither includes a DSAR tool. Enzuzo's Cookiebot vs CookieYes comparison covers both in detail.

What is the best cookie consent tool?

The best cookie consent tool depends on domain count, platform, and how much a business needs beyond a cookie banner. Enzuzo fits multi-domain businesses that want consent and DSARs on one plan, CookieYes fits a single WordPress site, and OneTrust fits enterprise governance programs. Enzuzo's roundup of the best consent management platforms compares a wider field.

Why are Cookiebot customers switching in 2026?

In Enzuzo's sales calls, Cookiebot customers who switch cite cost first. Billing is per domain by page count, every subdomain bills separately, and the bill climbs whenever a scan counts more pages but doesn't fall on its own when pages go. Teams that need DSARs, regional rules they can change in a dashboard, or support they can reach name those next. Enzuzo's Cookiebot review covers the common problems in detail.

Is Cookiebot being discontinued?

Cookiebot is not being discontinued. Usercentrics,which owns it, still sells Cookiebot Core's Premium plans on the Cookiebot pricing page. What changed is how Usercentrics sells it. The pricing page now points multi-brand buyers to Usercentrics Advanced, a session-priced plan, which leaves Cookiebot Core looking like the smaller of two products rather than one that is closing. .

Can I switch from Cookiebot without losing my consent setup?

Switching from Cookiebot usually means rebuilding the banner from scratch, and past consent records stay with Cookiebot. Exporting those records as CSV, a Premium feature, keeps them on file, and the new banner should go live before cancelling, because removing Cookiebot's script doesn't stop billing. Enzuzo's Cookiebot pricing guide explains cancellation, and its review includes a full switching checklist.