Consent management built for your role

No. It's one platform, one implementation, one login, used by everyone involved. Enzuzo is built so a single deployment covers the technical implementation (CTO), the marketing measurement impact (CMO), and the compliance and audit requirements (legal) at once, rather than requiring separate tools or contracts per function.

It varies by company size. At smaller companies, a founder or marketer usually drives the whole decision. At mid-market companies, an IT manager or ops lead typically initiates evaluation, with legal or finance approving. At larger platforms, a CTO or VP Engineering usually owns the decision, sometimes with legal and procurement involved on longer enterprise cycles.

Yes, that's the common path for mid-market and enterprise deals. Enzuzo supports multi-stakeholder evaluations, including security questionnaires and a DPA for procurement, and Enzuzo's team (including the CTO directly, for complex enterprise onboarding) works with technical, marketing, and legal stakeholders in the same process rather than routing each function to a different contact.

Because CTOs, CMOs, and legal teams evaluate the same platform for different reasons. A CTO cares about API access, security posture, and implementation effort. A CMO cares about protecting analytics and ad measurement (Google Consent Mode v2, GA4 data loss from opt-outs). A legal or compliance lead cares about audit trails and regulatory coverage across jurisdictions. Each page leads with the angle that matters to that role.

Yes. These pages map to the three roles Enzuzo sees most often in a buying committee, not an exhaustive list of titles. IT managers, ops leads, VP Engineering, marketing directors, and privacy officers typically recognize themselves in whichever of the three pages is closest to their responsibilities.